Anxiety Heightens at Tema Port as MPS Demands 11% Increase in Handling Charges

Demands for tariff increment by the Meridian Port Services (MPS) from the Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority (GPHA) are heightening tension over the operationalisation of the new terminal facility, come June 28, 2019.

The MPS, which, per a concessionaire contract signed in 2015, is expected to take over the operations of the Tema Port, is asking the GPHA to adjust container handling charges by 11 per cent

Anxiety among port workers was raised by a letter from the MPS addressed to the Director General of the GPHA, Mr Michael Luguje, a copy of which the Daily Graphic sighted, asking the authority to grant an 11 per cent increment in port tariffs, including marine, cargo and terminal charges, to reflect provisions in the concession agreement and contract, after having earlier slapped a 9.1 per cent increment on handling tariffs on port users.

The letter, signed by the Chief Finance Officer of the MPS, Mr Sunil Bansal, on May 24, 2019, said the tariffs for the new terminal had been drawn in line with the provisions of the deed of amendment of June 12, 2015 and would, therefore, want the GPHA to grant the request within the schedule clauses of the original concession agreement.

The tariffs cut across container handling charges, vessel berth charges and other port user fees.

Some port users said when implemented, it would increase the general cost of doing business at the Tema Port.

n the letter, the MPS argued that considering that the new terminal would become operational on June 28, 2019, the request ought to be granted early to enable port users to become accustomed to them.
Similarly, it said, the granting of the remaining percentage was to enable the company to begin to recoup its investments.

While the players have questioned the timing for the tariff increases in the wake of moves by the government to review portions of the agreement, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the MPS, Mr Mohammed Samara, maintained that the proposal was a matter of discussion between the company and the GPHA.
“Honestly, I don’t think it is appropriate to discuss this while the issue is being discussed with the GPHA,” he said in a terse response to the Daily Graphic when it sought clarifications on the issue.